![]() |
| Protest in Wisconsin, 2011 |
FEATURE
Poor No More! Or That 'Hard-Working Middle Class'
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
2/23/2011 01:56:00 PM
Labels: Barack Obama, Class Warfare, collective bargaining, Koch Brothers, KOCH INDUSTRIES, Middle Class, POVERTY, Sarah Palin, Scott Walker, union, union busting, Wisconsin
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
Ocean's Thirteen: Crime without punishment
Nobody knows if BP will be able to cap the raging oil well and end the spill in the coming days, weeks, or months. But what we do know is that there will be no real punishment for its crimes against our environment, our wildlife, and the men and women who have for generations lived for the sea and by the sea. This is no mere accident. It is a high crime against men, women, children, and the natural world.
Punishment means that the company’s top execs spend some real time in the slammer for the deaths of twelve workers, and for those environmental crimes which occurred through their cost cutting practices and Cheney chicanery. In an ideal world the company and all its profits would be confiscated: their billions used to clean up the mess if the cleanup is even possible. And that’s for openers.
There is of course the Cheney question. Nobody knows what happened in those secret meetings with oil company execs which Cheney held in the White House, but an educated guess would be that the relaxation of safety standards that brought about this tragedy came in with Halliburton’s Oil Slick Dick – deregulation for fun and profits.
Disgrace is what happens to most of these people, but disgrace is hardly a true reckoning for BP and its minions, the BP execs behaving as if the very questioning of their motives and competence is an act of incredible colonial rudeness. Continued...
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
5/27/2010 05:23:00 PM
Labels: Barack Obama, BP, Commentary, Corruption, Dick Cheney, Environment, GULF OIL DISASTER, GULF OIL SPILL, Sarah Palin, Sherman Yellen
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
That Acrid Smell in the Air
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
4/02/2010 01:37:00 PM
Labels: Commentary, Health Care Reform, Militia Movement, Oklahoma City Bombing, Politics, Responsibility, Sarah Palin, Sherman Yellen, Tea Party Movement, Timothy McVeigh
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
Palin Loses Attempt to Block Protection of Alaska's Whales
The answer is in. According to the National Marine Fisheries Service, run by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the whales, whose population declined by 50& in the 1990's, have shown no recovery despite the protections already in place. As such, the federal government determined on Friday that the "beluga whales species native to Anchorage, Alaska, is endangered and will require protection to survive."
NOAA's decision to list whales means any federal agency that funds, authorizes, or carries out new projects or activities in the area must first consult with NOAA to determine the impact on Anchorage's beluga whales."NOAA scientists estimated the Cook Inlet beluga population at 375 for both 2007 and 2008," NOAA stated. "Estimates have varied from a high of 653 belugas in 1994 to a low of 278 belugas in 2005."
The listing has the potential to affect major Alaska projects including an expansion of the Port of Anchorage, additional offshore oil and gas drilling, a proposed $600 million bridge connecting Anchorage to Palin's hometown of Wasilla and a massive coal mine 45 miles south of Anchorage.
Palin had opposed the endangered listing -- as well as one decreed for polar bears due to melting summer sea ice -- in part by questioning the science and saying the listings would hinder oil and natural gas drilling.
NOAA has stated they will determine -- within one year -- the changes needed in the whales' habitat for their survival. In the meantime, the placement of the beluga whales on the endangered list provides for their protection according to NOAA scientists' assessment of the species' needs which supersedes Governor Palin's and the Bush Interior Department's interpretation of science... Continued...
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
10/23/2008 11:58:00 PM
Labels: Center for Biological Diversity, Endangered Species, Fauna, NOAA, Politics, Sarah Palin, Science
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
2010 Scenarios - Which country do you want first?
Have you thought about what America will be like two years into the next administration?
Here are four scenarios:
First scenario - McCain:
We're in proxy wars with Russia and in a bomb, bomb, bomb war with Iran.
Out-of-work parents say goodbye to their enlisted sons and daughters.
President McCain adds more cars to the thirteen(?) he currently owns.
Ditto on the houses.
A safe education is available only for the home-schooled or vouchered.
Health care becomes more out of reach to those who can't afford it.
Drilling is everywhere but ANWR and, yet, oil is over $200 a barrel.
Alternative fuels legislation receives lip-service but little effective support.
There are no salmon.
Tucker Bounds becomes Press Secretary. Doug Holtz-Eakin is the new CEO of Blackberry.
Questions about policies are met with blame and obfuscation.
Sound far-fetched? Perhaps.
But what if it's not?
Second scenario - McCain:
See above for the rest.
Sound far-fetched? Perhaps.
But what if it's not?
Third scenario - Palin:
Social Security and Medicare are discontinued. Health care is unattainable.
Tent cities spring up in city parks. National parks are buzzed by aerial hunters.
Hurricanes wipe out the Gulf coast, the oceans have become one big dead zone with only lionfish and jellyfish, America's beaches are covered with garbage; the Midwest is a permanent flood zone (between tornadoes), cities, chokingly polluted, are filled with paranoid citizens with gun permits, new prisons are the only new home construction, twenty-five percent of endangered species have passed the tipping point to extinction, though not on any government list, and Saudi Arabia and Dubai (where Dick Cheney is living out his retirement) have matched China, India and Iraq in owning our over thirty-three trillion dollar national debt.
Sound far-fetched? Perhaps.
But what if it's not?
Fouth scenario - Obama:
It is 2010. President Barack Obama has formed a coalition with our (once again) allies to put pressure on Iran to belly up to the diplomacy bar. Joe Biden and Bill Clinton are dispatched to speak with world leaders who respect them.A worldwide coalition has formed to combat the root causes of terrorism and shore up failing states.
Bipartisan government programs, pushed through by a Democratic majority in both houses, are instituted to forestall foreclosures while forcing corporate responsibility. Wall Street and Main Street (slowly) recover.
The homeless, rather than being beaten up by unattended teens, are ushered into community programs, as are unattended teens. Continued...
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
9/21/2008 02:26:00 PM
Labels: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Climate Change, Economy, Environment, Global Warming, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, John McCain, Politics, Sarah Palin, War
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
It’s Tough Being A Teenaged Parent
Statistics on the fate of teen mothers and the futures of children born to mothers aged 18 and under continue to be disappointing. Few teen mothers have a an adequate, structured support system to help them and their children – including an intact family or paternal assistance and love for their children -- and the negative consequences for these mothers and for their children are disturbing.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, by 12th grade, over 60 percent of teens have had sex. Moreover, improvements in contraceptive use have leveled off and that the teen birth rate is on the rise for the first time in 15 years. According to the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, one in three teenage girls becomes pregnant before the age of 20, 8 out of 10 of these pregnancies are unintended, and 80 percent of teen births are out-of wedlock. The teenage birth rate in the U.S. is the highest in the developed world.
The consequences for teen parents are stark: having a child before age 19 significantly reduces the probability of a teen girl’s finishing high school or going to college, and increases the probability of her reliance on public assistance programs such as TANF, food stamps and housing assistance. Teen fathers of teen mothers’ children earn less than adult fathers.
The consequences for the children of young teen mothers are also distressing: an Illinois study showed that teen mothers were 2.2 times more likely to have a child placed in foster care during the first five years after a birth. They were also twice as likely to have a reported case of abuse or neglect— almost one in ten children of young teen mothers were reported for abuse or neglect.
Children of teen mothers are also more likely to drop out of high school. Sons of adolescent mothers are 2.2 times more likely to spend time in prison -- nearly 14 percent of the sons of adolescent mothers have been in prison by their late-30s, compared to six percent of the sons of mothers aged 20-21. Daughters of adolescent mothers are more likely to become teen mothers themselves.
Teen childbearing in the United States costs taxpayers at least $9.1 billion, according to a 2006 report by Saul Hoffman, Ph.D. and published by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Most of these costs are the result of the negative consequences for the children of teen mothers, including increased costs for health care, foster care, and incarceration.
While fathers of children born to teen mothers need to provide support and love to their children, teen marriages are generally not the solution to teen pregnancy: they are particularly unstable and result in a significantly higher divorce rate than that of couples who marry when they are out of their teens. Girls who marry between conception and birth are less likely to return to school than those who don’t marry. Young relationships also involve high levels of violence. Teen marriages often result in a rapid second birth and worse economic and educational outcomes for the mother and her child. However, marrying before the birth of a child may also lead to greater paternal support, a residential father, and even if the couple divorces, greater financial support and greater paternal access to the child. Continued...
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
9/10/2008 12:12:00 PM
Labels: Health, John McCain, Labels: Barack Obama, Living, Politics, Sarah Palin, Teenage Pregnancy
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)
FEATURE
Sarah Palin as George Bush
Sorry, Sarah, that husky don't hunt.
Palin's (Matthew Scully's) speech revealed a surprising parallel to George Bush -- albeit with phonetic care given to the correct pronunciation of certain words -- in her bid to become vice president to an aging politician with a history of health problems amid a pointed lack of relevance to the issues at hand and a cynical willingness to distort the truth.
The RNC talking points/heads are now questioning the media for pointing out that Palin's speech was written by Bush's former speechwriter (who'd only met her a week before).
What about the democrats, they charge; are you asking them who writes their speeches???
The answer, in the case of Barack Obama, at least -- since he was the focus of Scully's speech -- is that Barack Obama is the primary writer of his own speeches, a point the RNC has made many times in their attempts to denigrate his abilities as both a writer and speaker.
As for Senator Biden, no one can accuse him of not speaking his mind or of not caring about women's issues, given that he was the driving force behind the Violence Against Women Act.
[Former Wasilla mayor] Stein says that as mayor, Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them. "The librarian was aghast." The librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, couldn't be reached for comment, but news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire her for not giving "full support" to the mayor.Those who question Palin's policies do not receive an answer to their questions, while any concern about her qualifications as a future commander-in-chief are dismissed as sexism. That's silly, of course. Especially when the only information her speechwriter has offered constitutes identity politics and divisive attacks on community organizers, parroting a new campaign by Rush Limbaugh to define such community organizers, many of whom are ethnic in background, as "radical activists."
Are we to accuse the RNC and their media allies of racism?
Or perhaps it's conservative elitism: We don't need no stinking "radical activists" stirring up disenfranchised ethnic communities and getting them to demand a fair shake. Continued...
Posted by
The Environmentalist
at
9/04/2008 02:36:00 AM
Labels: Barack Obama, Climate Change, Dick Cheney, Environment, Extremism, George Bush, Global Warming, Joe Biden, John McCain, Matthew Scully, Media, Politics, RNC, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin
SUBSCRIBE TO: POSTS (RSS)

